Wibawakah polis Perancis dan SUARAM jika Altantunya tak masuk Perancis?

Semalam Asia Sentinel mendedahkan semua 153 dokumen yang kini berada pada Hakim Penyiasat Perancis mengenai pembelian Scorpene oleh Malaysia.

Suaram kata dokumen itu rahsia dan tidak boleh didedahkan tapi bagaimana ianya boleh diperolehi oleh akhbar? Berikut kenyataan dari laman web SUARAM :

Following the commencement of the inquiry, SUARAM has gained full privileged access to the 153 investigation papers from the Public Prosecutor’s office. This is a huge step forward, as many of the details kept confidential are now made accessible to SUARAM as the civil Plaintiff in the criminal case against the DCNS (French shipbuilding company).

French law provides several constraints on the area of access. While we are not able to obtain a hard copy and distribute copies, we are however entitled to full view of the documents and are able to quote them to the media and to the public.

Hanya beberapa pihak saja yang dapat access kepada dokumen itu: Mahkamah (Hakim dan pegawai mahkamah), Peguam Suaram, Suaram, dan Polis menyiasat yang perolehi dokumen.

Bagaimana 153 dokumen itu boleh bocor di Asia Sentinel sini semalam?

Sekarang dilaporkan FMT sini bahawa Altantunya tidak masuk ke Perancis.

Manakala Asia Sentinel ada menunjukkan gambar Altantunya berada di Perancis dalam laporan mereka bertarikh December 5hb 2007 sini

Namun begitu gambar tersebut tidak dapat membuktikan dia berada di sana bersama Razak Baginda atau pada tahun bila atau atas tujuan apa?

Bagi polis Perancis mengatakan dalam dokumen 76 bahawa Altantunya tidak berada di Perancis bermakna Tian Chua telah berbohong mengenai kononnya Altantunya dan Razak Baginda serta Dato Najib makan malam bersama.

Adakah polis Perancis lemah dalam penyiasatan mereka?

Menurut commentor di laman web Rocky sini berbunyi:

IT.Sheiss said...

Dato' Rocky,

This evidence is inconclusive, since while the French have no record of her landing in France during the said period, neither does it prove that she was not there.

Under the Schengen Accord, there are no immigration checks for travelers between European Union countries and also Switzerland so there probably is no way the French police would know if Altantuya had entered France from a neighbouring EU country during that period.

I've experienced this myself and only had to go through immigration in the EU country in which I landed in from Malaysia and the EU country from which I departed to Malaysia.

So, only had Altantuya landed in France from outside the EU would she have had to go through French immigration who would then have a record.

However, from a legal perspective, there is no record which can be presented in a court of law.

That's the key point, unless there are other pieces of evidence such as hotel records, purchase records, eye witnesses accounts, etc. which would testify otherwise.

1:09 PM

Yang penting dalam dokumen 76, polis membuat kesimpulan bahawa Altantunya tidak mungkin adalah penterjemah bagi nego antara pihak Perancis dan Malaysia. Bagi pihak Perancis, orang Malaysia boleh berbahasa Inggeris dengan baik dan segala urusniaga dengan DCN dijalankan dalam bahasa INggeris.

Tiada isu Altantunya ini menuntut bahagian dia dalam komisyen seperti yang dimainkan oleh pembangkang.

TIdak mungkin Altantunya yang bahasa Perancis dia tak pandai, bahasa Inggerisnya teruk dan hanya tahu bahasa Rusia boleh berperanan sebagai millitary broker atau penterjemah.

SUARAM dan Pembangkang berbohong!